armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

McNabb to Chicago? Only if the Colts Won't Part With Peyton...

10
Vote

by user JasonO

Rumors are circulating that Donovan McNabb could end up in Chicago at some point, possibly prior to this year's season opener. One source of these rumors is this article by Don McKee of the Philadelphia Inquirer.

McKee writes about a potential McNabb-for-Lance Briggs swap, saying "this scenario obviously depends on two things. One, that McNabb is physically ready to play on Week 1 of the 2007 season. Two, that Chicago is convinced McNabb is their best available QB option."

While I doubt the Bears would balk at acquiring McNabb if he weren't going to be healthy to play until, say, week four, I do agree they would only pursue him if he was their best available option. After all, if there were something better on the table such as Peyton Manning or Tom Brady, the Bears would be wise to let the teams duke it out. If the Patriots offer Brady for Briggs, maybe that would force the Colts to up the ante to Peyton and a first round pick next year. Why limit yourself to Donovan McNabb if you can get so much more?

But I think McKee overlooked a third factor at play. It would also depend on whether or not the members of the Eagles' front office can be considered morons. What better adjective could be applied if they were willing to deal their franchise quarterback for a linebacker who has stood in the shadows of Brian Urlacher all these years, and has decided that despite the fact he has a signed contract with Chicago, he does not want to play there any more (TO anyone?). Briggs may be good at his position, but there are lot of "good players" in the NFL at each position. I am not convinced the Eagles want Briggs at all right now, especially with the recent addition of Takeo Spikes from Buffalo. But even if they did, would they really trade McNabb for him?

McKee does say the part about McNabb being traded before the season is all just a "theory". I have no problem with theories, but I do take issue with any faulty reasoning that may frame them- such as McKee's statement that "the question most Eagles fans are asking right now is: Why would the Bears make that deal?"

The real question they are asking is why in God's name would Philly ever make that deal? McNabb has played well, is by no means a locker room cancer, has not asked for a new contract or done anything else that would merit the team wanting to get rid of him. His only downside right now is the injury issue, but his injuries have all been unrelated- so it's not as if he has a high risk of re-aggravating the same problem. Sure there is no guarantee McNabb won't get hurt again this year, but then there is no guarantee that backups A.J. Feeley, Kelly Holcomb, or Kevin Kolb won't get sidelined, and it's certainly not as if Lance Briggs himself isn't vulnerable.

Final verdict on this rumor/theory? If it was for Briggs and Chicago's first round picks for the next three years, that's a theory that would get my attention. Otherwise, a Briggs for Feeley and a fourth rounder would be more down to earth.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
ItsinhowyouinflectWaterboy
474 days ago
Score 0+-
1) briggs was hardly playing in urlachers shadow; he was a key member of the bears defense for the last few seasons.

2) briggs isn't holding out because he doesn't want to play there, he's holding out for a fair contract that he has earned, which isn't unprecedented at all in todays NFL.

that said, yeah, theres no way this trade happens and the guy suggesting it might be legally retarded.
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
474 days ago
Score 0+-
True and True...here's the deal

First of all, Don McKee's article says that this is the rumor...not what he thinks, but this is what he's heard...He also says it hasn't gotten much press (Probably because it wouldn't happen).

1) While the trade is plausible...no way it happens this year, that's a guarantee...the eagles hedged their bets with the kolb pick, and he's not designed for trade bate (unless the right deal comes along)...

2) The trade doesn't happen for a few reasons...you don't trade franchise QBs for linebackers...period. The eagles are notorious for underrating the LB position...they gave up darwin walker and a 4th rounder for Spikes...not much considering they signed 2 tackles this summer and have 2 picks invested (2005 and 2006).

3) For Briggs, all he wants is insurance...look, so he makes 10mil+ this year...that's great, but if he sucks (hypothetically) or hurts himself...he could stand to lose a lot of $$...sell high is the way the world is now and briggs wants to do that...but you can't blame the bears here...blame the NFLPA...
Permalink
DNLLegend
474 days ago
Score 1+-
As opposed to "illegally retard"?
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
474 days ago
Score 0+-
no, legally retarded just means your IQ is below 60, or something like that. There's not Illegally retarded, but if you don't meet that, legally you aren't mentally retarded
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
474 days ago
Score 1+-
What is the punishment for being illegally retarded...a fine? Isn't that just the lottery scratch tickets?
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
474 days ago
Score 2+-
If someone is found to be Illegally retarded, they have to serve 700 years in jail
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
474 days ago
Score 1+-
10 years for each IQ point? This seems fair and well within the american legal system
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
474 days ago
Score 0+-
exactly. Ain't America Great!!!!! :)
Permalink
JasonOWaterboy
474 days ago
Score 0+-
What I meant by "shadow" wasn't that he didn't play well- in fact I said he did. But with a guy like Urlacher playing so well on the other side, how well will Briggs look on his own? In regards to "briggs isn't holding out because he doesn't want to play there, he's holding out for a fair contract that he has earned, which isn't unprecedented at all in todays NFL." He signed his contract, and the NFLPA also agreed to the CBA that gives teams the right to put a franchise tag on the player. The Bears have a right to put a tag on him- players know about the tag, they sign contracts, but then they get bent out of shape when the tag is applied. They need to take that up with the NFLPA and in the meantime play by the rules of their contracts. Sure Briggs is not the only one, but not every player does this. In my opinion, it is a turnoff to the Eagles considering what they went through with TO.
Permalink
JasonOWaterboy
474 days ago
Score 0+-
JuTMSY4 wrote "Don McKee's article says that this is the rumor...not what he thinks, but this is what he's heard". To clarify it says it his theory- he says the concept of a McNabb trade has been going around as a rumor, but this is a theory of his that has McNabb going to Chicago before the season. Again I have no problems with hypotheticals, I was just set back a bit by some of the assumptions he made.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
474 days ago
Score 0+-
Fair enough, I saw his article in this morning's paper and I didn't read the whole thing because I think its BS...but this is the quote I read.

"So while cautioning you that this scenario is strictly the inner thought of one of the area's most sage football observers, here's one compelling theory: The recent drafting of quarterback Kevin Kolb could mean that Donovan McNabb will be traded before the 2007 season."

Take from that what you will

Good Article Jason
Permalink
JasonOWaterboy
474 days ago
Score 0+-
"So while cautioning you that this scenario is strictly the inner thought of one of the area's most sage football observers"... I thought he was referring to himself as the sage observer, perhaps he was referring to some unnamed person. Either way though, as I noted it was the reasoning I took issue with, not so much the fact that he might think it could happen. Thanks for the comment about the article.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
473 days ago
Score 0+-
Uncle?
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
474 days ago
Score 0+-
You're and idiot if you think anyone in the NFL would do McNabb, Peyton, or Brady for Briggs straight up. You'd need probably multiple first round picks, Briggs, and a starting QB to make that deal, and I still think that's not enough. If you offered me Brady for the original LT I'd still take Brady. Elite QB's are harder to find than Elite LB's
Permalink | Reply
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
474 days ago
Score 0+-
Didn't I just say that?
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #1
474 days ago
Score 0+-
Thanks for the comment. The part about the Brady/Manning bidding war for Briggs with the Colts upping the ante to Manning and a first round pick was sarcasm. I thought it was pretty obvious especially considering the next paragraph after that, but I guess not.
Permalink
JasonOWaterboy
474 days ago
Score 1+-
Anonymous comment above is mine, didn't realize I wasn't logged in when posting.
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
474 days ago
Score 0+-
wasn't necessarily saying it wasn't,I was just saying anyone who would trade a Starting QB for a LB straight up has issues
Permalink
JasonOWaterboy
474 days ago
Score 0+-
my sentiments exactly False Prophet, which is why the article really blew me away. The guy was just talking about his theory, sure, but he made the assumption that if the trade were on the table, it would be the Bears that might balk, when, as I wrote, I can't imagine a straight up McNabb for Briggs deal would ever be on the table (well maybe a few years down the road if McNabb is nearing the end of his career and Kolb is playing well).
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
474 days ago
Score 0+-
The eagles don't care about a linebacker, even briggs...that wouldn't happen...now if the bears gave up lineman or even some DBs, they might talk...otherwise...forget it...
Permalink
Anonymous Fanatic #2
474 days ago
Score 0+-
Did you say linemen? Alex Brown wants out too. How about Briggs and Brown for McNabb and a 3rd rounder.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
474 days ago
Score 0+-
Alright you caught me...I don't think the eagles would take a lineman via trade with justice and jean-gilles riding the pine
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
474 days ago
Score 0+-
change it to a second rounder and I think you'd have a deal
Permalink
DNLLegend
474 days ago
Score 0+-
I don't think it's that far-fetched -- but it's a year early. There's no way the Eagles will go with a rookie QB this year. They're too good of a team to throw someone like Kolb into the fire. Feeley isn't a solution, either. But give Kolb a year to run with the b-team and handle a clipboard, then, we'll see what they do with McNabb.
Permalink | Reply
False ProphetAll-Star
474 days ago
Score 1+-
a top QB for a LB? Are you kidding me? No way PHI'd make that deal straight up.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
474 days ago
Score 0+-
Here's the deal w/ your concept DNL (and I see your point). McNabb is a franchise QB, who's turning 31 this year...He will start for the Philadelphia Eagles this year (baring injury etc), there is no doubt in my mind. There is a possibility that he could be dealt...he is due over 10 mil next year...and after this year, none of his contract is guaranteed...he's on the eagles time...then again, he's also a ridiculously good franchise QB (you don't just buy them at the store), who may or may not lead his team to the big game...There's too many variables to speculate right now...but if the eagles get a good enough offer...they will think about it... This deal doesn't happen straight up...
Permalink
DNLLegend
474 days ago
Score 0+-
Drew Bledsoe was traded for a #1 -- and in-division.

Trent Green was traded for a #1.

I realize that both of these situations had a somewhat-established QB at the helm, and that the traded QB was already replaced. But if Kolb is going to be groomed to be at the helm -- which is something we're pre-supposing -- then a #1 pick for McNabb is hardly absurd.

Right now, I think Briggs could fetch a #1 pick. He's really good and a known commodity. So, I think the trade is perfectly reasonable.
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
474 days ago
Score 0+-
your better than that Dan. Trent Green and Drew Bledsoe? McNabb is much better than both of those guys. McNabb could have/would have been MVP if he didn't tear his ACL
Permalink
DNLLegend
474 days ago
Score 0+-
Green and Bledsoe were plus QBs. McNabb is a huge injury risk, has questionable affinity with his teammates, is 31, and the Eagles did fine with Jeff freakin' Garcia. I can easily talk his value down further. :)
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
474 days ago
Score 0+-
Well...The Bills had the pats by virtue of knowing Bledsoe was making too much and wasn't going to play...plus, considering what happened to him leading up to that, his price dropped...the McNabb concept could apply because of the injury...if its after this season, depends on how he plays

Green is probably a better example, but certainly isn't the caliber of mcnabb...of course, we all know how it turned out...

I agree, Briggs could fetch a #1

Kolb, is going to be groomed for the helm, there's no doubt..but will he pan out? Will McNabb play well? Who will push the eagles over the top? It all depends and we'll just have to wait and see

I hope the kolb draft makes McNizzle throw it in their faces and win one...because then we'll errect a statue on broad st. of him...
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
474 days ago
Score 0+-
Tom Brady was shot in the head, the pats just acquired Peyton Manning and he was also shot...now the NFL has shown mercy and given the pats to borrow one QB for 1 year to do whatever they like with (except trade) and then return him the next year...who do they take... Donovan McNabb...
Permalink
Clayton St. John Smythe Esq.Varsity
474 days ago
Score 0+-
All of these rumors are just B.S. Don't you guys know that Devin Hester will start at Q.B. for the Bears this season???
Permalink | Reply
Tyrone BriggsHall of Famer
473 days ago
Score -1+-
Who the heck appointed False Prophet as the God for ArmchairGM?
Permalink | Reply
False ProphetAll-Star
473 days ago
Score 0+-
no one. Since when does sharing my view make me god of AGM?
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free


Retrieved from "http://www.armchairgm.com/McNabb_to_Chicago%3F_Only_if_the_Colts_Won%27t_Part_With_Peyton..."

This page was last modified 13:08, 21 May 2007. Content is available under the GFDL.

Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User JasonO | May 21, 2007 | NFL Opinions | Philadelphia Eagles Opinions | Chicago Bears Opinions | Donovan McNabb Opinions

Contribute

ArmchairGM's pages can be edited.
Is this page incomplete? Is there anything wrong?
Change it!

Edit this page Discuss this page Page history

Recent contributors to this page

The following people recently contributed to this article.

Embed this on your site

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise