armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

Barkingclam
Freelance writer, student

More By Barkingclam

Wimbledon, Corporate Jingoism and the myth of the Instant Classic
8 votes, 2 comments
The Sonics? That team doesn't live here anymore
6 votes, 2 comments
Was game six rigged in 2002? 82games finds out
15 votes, 19 comments
View All

Other recent contributors

Make this page better by editing it.

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

On the cusp of a better world of sport

by Barkingclam
created May 17, 2008, last edited June 03, 2008
15
Vote

We’re sitting on the cusp of something very big here.

No, not Hideki Matsui’s porn collection. I’m talking about a new, more equal frontier of athletics.

Yesterday, The Court of Arbitration for Sport ruled that amputee sprinter Oscar Pistorius can race in the Olympics, overturning an earlier ruling that said his prosthetic legs gave him an unfair advantage.

This latest, and perhaps most important, development shows a trend that sports is fast becoming more and more equal, just as society is.

We now live in an age where gay marriage is legal in California; where both a black man and a woman have a shot at being elected as President; where everybody has a chance to compete.

A little over a month ago, Danica Patrick won her first race (the Indy Japan 300), marking the first time that race has been won by a woman – and meaning that Patrick means business.

No longer a curiosity or an also-ran, Patrick is even being considered a favorite now for the Indy 500. Patrick, the driver whose small frame was considered an unfair advantage, could win one of the most famous races in the world.

Funny thing, those unfair advantages. Where else in the world would your gender, or the amount of leg you have, be considered not just unfair, but also an advantage.

When Patrick first started to race, some suggested that she races with weighed plates – making her car heavier then anybody else’s – to make the races fairer. After her win, one newspaper asked “is it time to start taking her seriously as a driver?”

Never mind that she had been racing in the IRL since 2005 and was named rookie of the year, right? She was just a curiosity on four wheels.

It’s not a lot different for Pistorius, either. Like Patrick, it’s easy to see him as a novelty, the racer who runs on fiberglass blades. But there’s something else, too. Like Patrick, he also has an overlooked advantage.

Determination. Patrick did not give up racing, even though she did not win a race in her first two seasons. She refused to let herself be put in the same class as other curiosities as Manon Rheaume or Amy Williams.

Pistorius did not give up when the Internation Association of Athletics Federations ruled he could not race. He fought that decision, right up to the highest court in sport, where he won his appeal.

It’s hard to see many of today’s more successful athletes to have the same kind of determination. If a basketball player doesn’t like his college coach, he can transfer to another school. If a hockey player doesn’t like his team, he can force a trade.

If they feel they’ve been slighted, they can just complain about it to the media or on their blog.

Instead, both Patrick and Pistorius both hung in and each ended up winning the respect they should have had all along.

And sport is better for it.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
DRE-LOAAA-er
62 days ago
Score 1+-
This is a great moment for sports!
Permalink | Reply
MegECass110AAA-er
62 days ago
Score 3+-
The Pistorious story is sooooooooo interesting...talk about seeing both sides of an issue. My personal opinion is, if you have overcome the physical and mental obstacles of having part of your legs amputated to even be CONSIDERED on the same level with able-bodied athletes, you've earned the right to race with them.
Permalink | Reply
Alex HolowczakMVP
62 days ago
Score 5+-
I hate the idea that Pistorius can run at the Olympics (should he qualify). There can be no debate as to whether his legs give him an advantage. They are not his legs! It's clearly an artificial aid, something the IOC will naturally ban. Under the "artificial aid" rule, he is clearly infringing the rules of competition. If he can run without his legs, then fine, go ahead. Look at Natalie du Toit, a South African swimmer. She competes in able bodied swimming events without a prosthetic limb. That's absolutely fine. I understand that it wasn't Pistorius' fault etc. but it can never be claimed not to be an unfair advantage. Comparing it to Danica Patrick is confusing, because Patrick didn't break any rules to take part. No rule says that women can't race. Athletics (Track & Field) rules state you can't use artificial aids to help (such as steroids). Pistorius is surely breaking the rules.
Permalink | Reply
Manny StilesAAA-er
62 days ago
Score 1+-
I hear what you're saying - Personally, I don't think Danica compares to Pistorius at all - and I can't say I disagree with your opinion, but scientific studies have shown that the advantage the blades have over a normal human leg is a 92% return of energy with the prosthesics vs. a 89% normal leg. That's fairly incremental, especially when you consider that he gets a VERY slow jump at the line (certainly much more than a 3% difference)

It definitely raises competitive fairness issues but I think if you take all things into consideration, he is still at a disadvantage over able bodied runners...


And he can bring a wonderful human element angle to the Olympics.


Afterall Alex, the motto and creed for the Olympics is:

"The most important thing in the Olympic Games is not to win but to take part, just as the most important thing in life is not the triumph but the struggle. The essential thing is not to have conquered but to have fought well."

I think he doesn't just fit that spirit, he defines it.


Besides, he isn't going to win anyway...
Permalink
Manny StilesAAA-er
62 days ago
Score 1+-
And when we start drawing lines at what is "artificial aid" and what is "natural", you get the imminent slippery slope. Access to superior training aids, reconstructive surgeries, contact lenses, drinking gatorade instead of water... etc.
Permalink
BarkingclamVarsity
62 days ago
Score 2+-
What I was trying to say is that both athletes shouldn't be defined - or denied - by what makes them different. Don't forget, people were really against Patrick when she started in the IRL; that she was a gimmick, that she was too light (and hereby faster), that it was another attack on a 'boys club'.

I don't see much of a difference for Pistorius. He shouldn't be defined as "that bladed runner" anymore then Patrick as "that lighter driver" or Tiger Woods as "that LASIKed golfer".

Sure, his legs give him an advantage. But the runners who train in a hyperbolic chamber have an advantage, too, and nobody is saying they shouldn't complete.
Permalink
Taytay 24Div-I Stud
62 days ago
Score 1+-
To add to Manny's list of "artificial aids": what about shoes?
Permalink
Steel TownAll-American
60 days ago
Score 1+-
Wow, only three percent. That is surprising. But, I suspect, that can be the differnce between first and second place. I understand why a lot of people are happy about this. It is a nice story. But, I find it hard to believe that even an incremental advantage can be accepted.


"what about shoes?" I think there is a big leap from fiberglass blades (springs) to shoes.

Imagine what would happen if an able bodied person found a way to use the blades. It is an unfortunate situatino for Pistorious, but I just can't agree with the ruling.
Permalink
Taytay 24Div-I Stud
60 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm not making a leap from blades to shoes. Manny pointed out that "artificial aids" is a slippery slope and gave a few examples. I simply added another fundamental "artificial aid" that every runner uses. Unless you are arguing that shoes are natural...
Permalink
OvertheedgeVarsity
61 days ago
Score 0+-
pistorious should not be allowed to run, that is what the special olympics are for
Permalink | Reply
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User Barkingclam | May 17, 2008 | May 2008 | Sports Opinions | Olympics Opinions | IRL Opinions | Danica Patrick Opinions | Oscar Pistorius Opinions | Auto Racing Opinions | Racing Opinions | General Opinions

Don't Miss

AGM Linebackers NFC East Preview
This Week in Sports: The Wackiest in Recent Memory
Early 2008-09 NHL Power Rankings
A call for Jonathan Papelbon to relax
USA Baseball announces Olympic Team Roster, Golden Spikes Winner

In the News

Clay Bennett has bought out the KeyArena lease from the city of Seattle, and that means the Seattle SuperSonics franchise is now defunct, and Oklahoma City will have an NBA team beginning this season.

Comments of the Day

3 When I first looked at it, I said no way the Skins finish last,...
3 Being 16-0 got the Pats a cupcake schedule too.
3 18-1*
2 Yeah well last year, Philly was last at 8-8. This is a stacked...
2 if you give everyone a minus for laughing at """...

Play the Quiz Game

Where will the 2014 FIFA World Cup be hosted

New Articles

10 Best Golf Images of the Tiger Woods Era
Knicks Summer League: Wilson Chandler Scorches the Suns
Blanton Will Help, But Myers Is Key
Vikings Go to Super Bowl With Favre at QB
Pinstripe Pulse: Yanks sign Sexson, Damon, Matsui experience rehab setbacks

Retrieved from "http://www.armchairgm.com/Article:On_the_cusp_of_a_better_world_of_sport"

This page was last modified 21:34, 17 May 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise