armchairgm
all sports, all you
+ Add Friends
You are not logged-in.
Sign Up - Log In
Main Page
Sports
Write
Articles
Hot Links
Images
Meet People
Fun
Explore
MLB - NFL - NBA - NHL - College Basketball - College Football - Soccer - Nascar - Other
Article - Locker Room Discussion
All Articles - New Articles - Today's Articles
Submit a Link - Approve Links
Picture Game - Ratings - Polls - Pick Game - Quiz Game - Spring Silliness
Random Page - Random Image - Random Fan

About the Author

False Prophet
Born and Raised in Murderapolis.

Develop action, thought, and desires by proliferation, juxtaposition, and disjunction, and not by subdivision and pyramidal hierarchization...

Do not demand of politics that it restore the "rights" of the individual, as philosophy has defined them. The individual is the product of power. What is needed is to "de-individualize" by means of multiplication and displacement, diverse combinations. The group must not be the organic bond uniting hierarchized individuals, but a constant generator of de-individualization....

Do not become enamored of power. - Michele Foucault; preface, Anti-Oedipus

RIP Tim Russert

More By False Prophet

Because I got High... (NFL Offseason Update - July 11, 2008
15 votes, 40 comments
The ArmchairGM 2008 NBA Mock Draft
25 votes, 182 comments
Showdown v2:Who is the Greatest NFL Running Back ever
27 votes, 76 comments
View All

Other recent voters

If you like the article, vote for it.
Edit
Page history Discuss pageWhat links here

Is Run-DMC Shipping up to Boston? (NFL Offseason Update - April 4, 2008)

by False Prophet
created April 04, 2008, last edited June 03, 2008
15
Vote

The long anticipated return of FP's obsessive homerism over the pats brings us to the subject of Darren McFadden. Just this week, he was reported to have stopped by the Patriots facilities for a pre-draft workout. Normally, this wouldn't be news. A top prospect is meeting with a team with a top 10 draft pick, right? The issue is that 1) The Patriots are never vocal about anything, and 2) McFadden should get drafted in the top 5. So what's going on then up in Foxboro? The sad part is, nobody knows. So I decided to weigh in:

Hmmm....McFadden to the pats. This is really an odd situation. I really think they can't trade up to get him, it'd take a lot, and they need youth on the defensive side of the ball (not to mention another Offensive Tackle, Matt Light really is not the type of player that should be protecting Tom Brady). If McFadden falls to the 7th pick, I say look to trade down. There'll be teams lower than 7th that would love to take him. If the pats can snag 2 later first round picks or a first and a second round pick (all in this year's draft), I look none other than to the Dallas Cowboys. Jerry Jones has already said he wants McFadden, and they have two picks in the 20s (22 and 28 thanks to the trade with the Browns last year so they could draft Brady Quinn). If the Cowboys are willing to make the deal, I say go for it. If not, then I think the smart move is to draft McFadden. He could make their offense even more explosive, and unpredictable. With Moss and Welker tearing up the DBs, Maroney and McFadden could create a situation where blitzing is extremely unstrategic. If that happens, I'd be pretty psyched.

Other NFL News and Notes

  • Pacman Jones is still trying to get traded to the Dallas Cowboys. My biggest issue here is why? What benefit is it to the Cowboys to trade for a player who has no timeframe for returning to the league? Why would they want a player who, upon return, isn't even guaranteed to make it the full year without getting suspended again. I still think they'd be better off using the draft pick on a player with potential, not trading it for garbage.
  • The NFL released the Primetime schedule for week 1: Thursday night is Giants-Redskins, Sunday Night is Colts-Bears, and Monday night is the Aaron Rodgers debut as starter against the Vikings, followed by Broncos-Raiders. I will watch Giants-Skins only because it's the season opener, but beyond that, I think it's a poor opening weekend schedule. Packers-Vikings will be good, if only because it's the first time in years that the Packers will play @ Lambeau without Favre. In total, we have 4 playoff teams from last year in primetime. Of which, only the Giants won a game. That's pretty poor planning Goodell. At least you scheduled the Super Bowl Champion and an exciting offensive team in the Colts. Beyond that, I give the schedule a yawn.
  • Fox Sports blogger Dwindy1 ranked all 32 teams' schedule based off of last year's win pct. Here's how it turned out:
	Team		SOS	07 Record

1. Pittsburgh Steelers	0.598	0.625
2. Indianapolis Colts	0.594	0.813
3. Jacksonville Jaguars	0.559	0.688
4. Baltimore Ravens 	0.551	0.313
5. Minnesota Vikings	0.551	0.500
6. Cincinnati Bengals	0.547	0.438
7. Cleveland Browns 	0.547	0.625
 8. Houston Texans	0.547	0.500
9. Detroit Lions	0.543	0.438
10. Tennessee Titans	0.543	0.625
11. Chicago Bears 	0.532	0.438
12. Green Bay Packers 	0.532	0.813
13. Dallas Cowboys	0.524	0.813
14. Washington Redskins	0.524	0.563
15. New York Giants	0.520	0.625
16. Philadelphia Eagles	0.520	0.500
17. St. Louis Rams 	0.489	0.188
18. San Francisco 49ers	0.485	0.313
19. Seattle Seahawks	0.477	0.625
20. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 0.469	0.563
21. Arizona Cardinals	0.465	0.500
22. Carolina Panthers	0.465	0.438
23. Miami Dolphins	0.465	0.063
24. Atlanta Falcons	0.461	0.250
25. New York Jets	0.457	0.250
26. Kansas City Chiefs	0.453	0.250
27. New Orleans Saints	0.450	0.438
28. Buffalo Bills	0.449	0.438
29. Denver Broncos	0.446	0.438
30. Oakland Raiders	0.438	0.250
31. San Diego Chargers	0.422	0.688
32. New England Patriots 0.387	1.000

So after an undefeated season, the pats get a top 10 draft pick, and the easiest schedule in the league. Nice. Can you say undefeated again?

  • SI's Ross Tucker Ranked the 5 Oline positions according to difficulty. It's a great story, and I highly recommend it. I think he's dead on, but I don't think it really correlates to importance. For me, Left Tackle is the most important (Qb's backside protection), then center (the one guy who ensures the rest of the team can do their job), then right tackle (preventing the edge rush), then left guard (backside guard) , then right guard.
  • SI's Tim Layden writes about how allowing 2 defensive players to have a headset in their helmet to communicate with coaches on the sideline. This will basically make defenses significantly better. Now, Defensive signal callers can tell who ever is calling Defensive signals what their looking at, what snap count to expect, coordinate audibles, and continue to get this information until 15 seconds are left on the play clock (that's when the Offensive headsets are turned off).
  • Thanks goes out to the Redskin Report for listing all the Rule Changes so far. They include:
  1. No Forceouts - This is probably the most dramatic change in the rules. Now, if a receiver lands out of bounds with the ball but was pushed out before landing, the pass is still incomplete. I think this sucks, because it means defenses now have a lot more control on sideline passes. My grade for the rule change: C-/D+
  2. Field Goals are Reviewable - Sure. I doubt this will come up any time soon. Grade: B
  3. Teams can defer the coin toss - I think this makes the coin toss more strategic. Teams with poor offenses but good defenses can now chose to kickoff both halves (in all likelihood), allowing them to get better field position for their offense. Grade: B+/A-
  4. Elimination of the 5 yard facemask penalty - Hooray!!! This means that there will be significantly more physical play. Players no longer have to be quite as careful with their hands on defense, and offensive players have to be more careful. Grade: A
  5. Missed Direct Snap from Center is now a fumble - I'm confused as to why this wasn't a rule before. Before it was a false start. It just makes sense. Grade: A

That's all for this edition. This series will be back post-draft, unless something major happens.


Enable Comment Auto-Refresher
TrizzAll-American
112 days ago
Score 2+-
I agree...worst opening weekend ever
Permalink | Reply
False ProphetAll-Star
112 days ago
Score 0+-
I don't even need the pats. Gimme the titans, chargers, jags, Cowboys, or even Browns. I don't want to watch Giants/Skins, or Raiders/Broncos
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
112 days ago
Score 1+-
AFC, AFC, AFC, Lamest team in the league, AFC...
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
112 days ago
Score 0+-
AFC is probably 8-9 teams deep. NFC isn't even 6. All those teams would be better than Skins/Giants and Broncos/Raiders, and better than the Bears. Gimme Colts/Titans or Colts/Jags
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
112 days ago
Score 2+-
you could have said that last year and it wouldn't have included the giants... and yet...here we are
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
112 days ago
Score 0+-
I'm fine with the Giants playing. They're the Current Champs, they've earned the right. There are just better matchups they could have put out there
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
112 days ago
Score 1+-
have you ever watched an NFC east matchup before?!?!
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
The Giants are deserving of the primetime game, but not fun to watch. Cowboys are usually fun to watch. Skins are not fun to watch, and they're not that good. Put them in the AFC and their maybe a 7 win team. Your Eagles are not a contender this year. The NFC east is overrated. It's window has closed.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
111 days ago
Score 1+-
you're just pissed that you got beat by the best division in football...

my eagles have done very well in the reid era and they didn't cheat...who knows how far this taping and what not goes...

you can think what you like, but by next january, you'll be humming a new tune....

If that pats played in the NFC east, they wouldn't have sniffed 16-0...

"oh, but they beat each team in the division"

well my friend, you gotta play them twice...and if you've watched NFC east football, you'd realize, the second game always makes the first look like a cakewalk...

the only thing worse than the arrogant pats and their arrogant douche of a coach are their arrogant fans...

sometime you should see a game at foxboro...
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
111 days ago
Score 2+-
and a 7 win team is the bills...whom the eagles beat...as did every other NFC east team...so i'm gonna go out on a limb here and say you're wrong...
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 1+-
Reid's a fine coach. The Eagles are generally a good team, but they're not in a spot to contend right now. Maybe via the draft and through the summer they'll change my mind.

toughest division in football my ass. AFC South, and AFC North are both harder than the NFC East.

Yes, the NFC East is better than the AFC East. So what? Look at my EFFING COMMENTS. Name one AFC East time I recommended playing. Let's recap: Dallas (NFC East), Jags (AFC South), Titans (AFC South), Browns (AFC North), Chargers (AFC West). None of this expresses Pats arrogance. I've watched the NFC East. They look good because they're evenly matched, and in an inferior conference, this makes them look better.

The pats lost because the Giants have a very good D line. Like they always say, the battle is won and lost at the line of scrimmage. If Brady was fully healthy, it could have been a different game (read this carefully, I chose could). Watch the film. I dare you. Watch brady. He could not plant his back foot very well, and the giants were able to capitalize on that.

I respect you Justin, but you wreak of the same arrogance you accuse me of. Not once did I mention the pats, and I even said the Giants deserve the opening weekend game. Don't judge me as a pats fan. I'm also a general observer of the NFL as a whole. Just because you can't respond to what I'm saying other than by screaming "pats fan arrogance" doesn't mean that I am being an arrogant pats fan or am wrong
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
Ok, maybe you're right. But outside the cowboys, none of them are playoff teams in the AFC (Giants might be, depends on which Eli Manning shows up)
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
111 days ago
Score 2+-
brady's injured...

you're kidding me right?

i mean, have i ever told you about how the eagles could have won if TO was healthy....

no...because its friggin' ridiculous...

go watch the tape of some eagles games...they win that packers game, or the bears game or one of the giants games and they're in the playoffs where...a wild card team can win the super bowl...

and the NFC east may or may not be extremely evenly matched, but historically it has always been like this...ask any football fan and they'll tell you...even when one team is awful and another is great, the games are all tough...its not about matchups...its just always that way....you get up for games

moreover...san diego...cleveland...tenneesee...3 pretty crappy markets as far as the NFL is concerned...and those teams are almost fraudulent...

you may not like it, but speaking as a pretty well cultured football fan, its a pretty good, classic matchup that has a better chance than not of being really entertaining...
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
let's look at the eagles. They were 8th in the NFC. In the AFC, they'd be the Houston Texans. They'd lose 4 games against the Colts and Jags. Best case, they'd split with the Titans. 1-5 in the division. I'll give them a win vs Denver. I'd say they lose against the Bucs. They'd lose to the Browns. They'd beat New Orleans. They'd beat the Raiders. They'd lose to the Chargers. They'd beat Carolina, KC, Miami, and ATL. That's 7-9. Skins would beat the Bucs. They'd be 8-8. Giants would be anywhere from 7-9 to 9-7 (they could beat the Chargers on a good day)
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
Win the super bowl? No. The Giants capitalized on a weak Oline and a bad ankle. I don't see the Eagles doing that.

Markets might not be good, but the games would be better. And I'd say VY would bring a larger market to the game. He's the only successful QB out of the class of 06. And you don't think that the Chargers would get more viewers than the Raiders?

It's a division game. I get it. It's still not that great of a game. The giants are never exciting to watch. They remind me of the Champion steelers. They win ugly. People only rooted for the steelers because of Jerome Bettis.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
111 days ago
Score 0+-
you're right...

go look at winning percentage against for each team in the NFL last year...

I'll give you a guess at who's on top...
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
And again, you wreak of the same arrogance you accuse me of by saying that I'm just a whiny pats fan
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
The Giants played the AFC East and the NFC North. That's like 4 free wins.
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
111 days ago
Score 1+-
you just compared a team QBed by matt schaub with a Team QBed with a top 5 QB in the NFL that's offensive...
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
111 days ago
Score 0+-
you are a whiny pats fan... and its not arrogance...its fact...
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
Top 5? Top 5 my ass. No way in hell Eli Manning is a top 5 QB. Top 10? Probably. Top 5? No. Brady, Manning, Garrard, Anderson, Romo in some order. All better than Manning. And if you think you're neutral, just don't even comment. You've come from a Philly fandom background, and live in Boston. No shit you're biased
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
111 days ago
Score 1+-
McNabb is top 5....Eli's top 50 or something ; - )
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
whiny? A logical (and true) explanation of the super bowl. That's whiny.

Arguing for Superior, non-patriots teams to play in the opening weekend. That's a whiny pats fan.

I'm sorry, I don't see pats bias. Especially when we're comparing a division in a Conference that's 8 teams deep, versus a conference where a QB with a completion pct. of less than 60% and that threw 20 INTs can make the playoffs.

And you call me biased. At least my top QB's complete over 60% of their passes, and don't throw 20 INTs
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
111 days ago
Score 0+-
i watch more pats games than you do...how ridiculous is that...
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
111 days ago
Score 0+-
they play better defenses...
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
bullshit. In terms of career, yes. He's probably top three. In terms of top QBs right now. No way. I don't think a 89.9 QB rating, a completion percentage of 61%, and who throws less than 20 TD's is a top 5 QB
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
Really? Pats beat the 1,2,3,5,9,10,13,14, and 17 top defenses according to football outsiders. I don't think they're facing bad defenses
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
111 days ago
Score 2+-
don't overload profootballreference's server bud...

relax...

let's let the how awesome the NFC East is go and get back on point here...

some day i'll teach you how to criticize a another person's favorite team appropriately ; - )

the point is, the giants-skins matchup is going to be good...its a typical NFC East smash mouth game...and they're awesome...you might not like it, but you're the exception, not the rule...

its the god damned champs playing a foe who made the playoff last year and is featuring a new coach...

plus its New york...and washington, a pretty large market in its own right...

plus daniel mega millions snider...

i mean, you wanna see another clunker like the colts and saints...meh...not me...give me defense and hard running any day
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
When the Eagles were fighting the cowboys for the division a couple years back, that was great football. It was still a very defensive oriented game, but the issue with the Giants/Redskins, is neither team is going to be that good. The Giants have the most Bi-Polar QB in recent history, and if he's not on his game, it will be very ugly
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
112 days ago
Score 1+-
I read a really cool article (i think of PFT) about the 2 defensive head sets and how it presents a pretty interesting point on them.

You can only have one of the field at any given time...and i mean literally....its not on and off, its one on the field, aka if you give bruschi and hobbs (purely hypothetical) one each, they both can't be on the field at the same time unless they change helmets...and even then, i'm not sure given whether or not you would have the prove it, etc...(check in like elig receivers?)

moreover, there were points about which 2 players it should be...perhaps a nickle corner and a 3rd LB (as those 2 would switch on and off the field regardless) or the playcaller for the D and a backup (i.e. two mikes) and so on...

this technology advantage could actually be a total bitch...
Permalink | Reply
False ProphetAll-Star
112 days ago
Score 0+-
I know. It doesn't matter. Having that technology on D will be such a huge improvement. I'd give it to 2 Mikes. They're generally the play callers, and I'd like to ensure that I could always have it on the field
Permalink
TerGreLittle Leaguer
112 days ago
Score -3+-
I think that it's not fair that the Patriotss get an easy schedule after wining 16 games cuz it means that they're cheating again and that's like spygate and bad.
Permalink | Reply
False ProphetAll-Star
112 days ago
Score 0+-
???
Permalink
JuTMSY4Hall of Famer
112 days ago
Score 0+-
i mean, the NFL scheduled is designed years in advance...the pats already know they're going to play NFC division X (4 games) and AFC division Y (4 games) as well their division (6 games)...which means they get 2 other games...and given their record last year, would be matchups against other division winners and/or playoff teams...
Permalink
Yakob878MVP
112 days ago
Score 0+-
One: the pats will trade out or grab some one like Xavier Adibi. Two The rule that needs to be implemented is to allow defensive captin have a radio in his helmet just like the qb's do. This would have prevented the imfamous spy gate if the vote was in favor of it last off season.
Permalink | Reply
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 1+-
One: Read the Article. If the pats can get either 2 first round picks, or a first and high second (San Francisco?), I'm cool with trading down. But regardless, they have to get the value for picks this year. Nothing for next year. We need the pick(s) to build for next season. Two: They allow the Teams to pick 2 players (only one of which can be on the field at a time) that are able to get signals via headset.
Permalink
LASportsblogAAA-er
112 days ago
Score -1+-
The long anticipated return of FP's obsessive homerism over the pats False Prophet
Permalink | Reply
LASportsblogAAA-er
112 days ago
Score -1+-
LOL Now, that was funny, False Prophet!
Permalink
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
Check my archives. I did the same thing, but just for the pats last year. I'm not that great at breaking down games in article format, but I love thinking about the offseason
Permalink
Taytay 24Div-I Stud
111 days ago
Score 1+-
I don't think McFadden will fall to the Pats, but even if he did, the Cowboys aren't trading up for him. JJ addresses that here. And he is right to say so. The Boys can make better use their two number ones than flipping them for McFadden.
Permalink | Reply
False ProphetAll-Star
111 days ago
Score 0+-
oh I agree. I makes no sense for the Cowboys to trade up. I was just saying that'd be a good trade for the pats
Permalink
Add your Comment
ArmchairGM welcomes all comments. If you don't want to be anonymous, Register or Login. It's free
Categories: Opinions | Opinions by User False Prophet | April 4, 2008 | April 2008 | NFL Opinions | NFL Offseason Update Opinions | Darren McFadden Opinions | New England Patriots Opinions

Don't Miss

Exclusive Interview: Justin Sits Down with Venom from American Gladiators
Exclusive interview with LPGA star Paula Creamer
Jay Gibbons and What's REALLY Behind the Steroid Issue...
Hawks Lose Josh Childress to Greece, Could This Happen Again?
The Sports Brief's MMA Rankings (7-23-08)

In the News

Hey ArmchairGM users! Want to help the admins update this news section? Click here to help us out.

Comments of the Day

1 WOW, this site is getting bigger by the day.
1 Wow, this is amazing! P.C. is my favorite LPGA player, gre...
1 Thanks guys
1 Cuban is just one of those guys that you either love him or ya...
1 They may never get rid of the drugs themselves, but ...
1 your and you"re. the difference between the two i...
1 I hope you"re not wasting your time...
1 Ah, your and there -- tis my kryptonite. All fixed, I think --...
1 Fantasy Sports brought Mylf and I together. We had epic fun be...
0 Cheezer, you hit the nail on the head!

Take a Poll

Best Athlete of the last 100 years (add some in comments if u want i am open to anything there are many i may have missed)
Muhammad Ali Michael Jordan Wayne Gretzky Pete Sampras Pele'

New Articles

Signs of the Apocalypse
Pitching Leads Giants
If Cuban Buys Chicago Cubs, Dallas Mavericks Are Done
NFL Preview Show Extravaganza: Detroit Lions
New Urine Test For HGH!

Retrieved from "http://www.armchairgm.com/Article:Is_Run-DMC_Shipping_up_to_Boston%3F_%28NFL_Offseason_Update_-_April_4%2C_2008%29"

This page was last modified 22:09, 4 April 2008. Content is available under the GFDL.

Main Page About Special Pages Help Terms of Use Advertise